Labels

Android (1) bash (2) boost (2) C (34) C++ (2) cheatsheet (2) CLion (6) css (3) Debian (33) DL (17) Docker (2) Dreamweaver (2) Eclipse (3) fail2ban (4) git (5) GitHub (4) Hacking (3) html (8) http (1) iOS (1) iPad (1) IRC (1) Java (31) javascript (3) Linux (167) Mac (19) Machine Learning (1) mySQL (48) Netbeans (4) Networking (1) Nexus (1) OpenVMS (6) Oracle (1) Pandas (3) php (16) Postgresql (8) Python (9) raid (1) RedHat (14) Samba (2) Slackware (47) SQL (14) svn (1) tar (1) ThinkPad (1) Virtualbox (3) Visual Basic (1) Visual Studio (1) Windows (2)

Tuesday, 20 November 2018

Slackbuilds

A note on Slackbuilds.

I noticed during some issues with fail2ban that as I had run my build script while anaconda2 was installed, this meant that the installation package when run would put binaries in the /opt/anaconds2/bin directory as opposed to /usr/bin

Even after removing anaconda2 directory and also entries from root and user .bashrc files, running the installation package, still put the fail2ban-client file in /opt/anaconds2/bin as opposed to /usr/bin

This I'm guessing was down to the fact that the python location was in my PATH when the build script was run and of course after this was removed, I rebuilt the installation package and installed and all was as expected.

I need to verify this as I thought you could run a build script and then use the installation package on a different machine, obviously with the same version of slackware but this may not be the case. Perhaps I was thinking about regular compiling into binaries?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.